"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlDOTnet> wrote in message
news:4684b2fa$1@news.povray.org...
> The falling star has become a plane imo :-)
yep .... i was dissapointed when radiosity made the sparkle disappear,
that's what gave it zing!
> In that case I would expect more details in the foreground soil. I think
> that is the reason why both do not seem to connect: the soil texture is
> virtually identical from foreground to background, diluting the sense of
> depth the plants are expected to provide.
you are absolutely correct .... that's what I was trying to do with the
additional ground cover amoungst the reed-ish plants in the foreground, but
I missed the mark perhaps I should make them more dense. I was also trying
to vary the scale and bumpiness of the ground texture as function of the
distance from the camera but didn't get the results I wanted. Thanks for the
feedback!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
